Thursday, January 22, 2015

Journal 4: January 22, 2015 by Torie Gray

Group Activity: Account/interpret all modes utilized in the slide about President Obama’s State of the Union Address

- Five modes= linguistic, visual, spatial, gestural, and oral

o   Linguistic=
·      The words on the chart/graph (title, stat numbers, markers on chart, and hashtag on bottom of chart)
o   Meanings: hashtag encourages participation; the labels on the chart clarifies the visual data
·      Obama’s words/ choice of words/speech itself
o   Their meaning conveys interpretation of the visual data on the chart; almost quoting

Visual=
·      Graph, which shows two contrasting lines with different colors
·      Who the cameraman selects composes the visual of the shot

Gestural=
·      Peoples’ body language and facial expressions; clapping or not clapping; standing or not standing; Biden and Boehner’s facial expressions
·      Republicans are communicating through gesture because they don’t have “the right to the podium at the moment”;

Aural=
·      Obama’s style or tone of delivery (slow and tempered but optimistic); exclamations; clapping

Spatial=
·      Split screen, audience on left side and the graph on the right
o   This is an important arrangement because people read from left to right, so we can infer that what is shown on the right supports the left side of the slide
o   Biden on Obama’s left; Boehner on his right

Modal Ensembles
o   All modes happen for a reason
o   Attend to the meaning behind the modes
o   What are the relationship between the modes used?

Representation of Modes:
-       Terms for multimodal composing are good terms for modal ensemble

The class related these terms to the modes used in the image of the State of the Union Address and found the following:
o   Redundant- Repeating words in the address
o   Complementary- Two modes operating together can enhance the meaning behind the writing
o   Supplementary- the graph/data supplements Obama’s speech
o   Juxtapositional- opinions; clapping/scoffing; hope/disheartening; audience happy/audience unhappy
o   Stage-setting- Obama meeting with leaders

Big meaning(s) from the multimodal image=
o   If you were unknown to background knowledge, the image is communicating that the data on the right is bad because of their facial expressions and gestures
o   Looked like a high school assembly because not interested, looking down
o   Republicans aren’t happy; uninterested
o   Clear that people are unhappy, but because we don’t know the background from the image itself (in other words, the modes aren’t in full), it is unclear what they are happy about

**Putting modes together can create more complicated meanings

Kress “Gains and Losses”
-       Identifying a revolution
-       Page 6- modes of representation have shifted to a more image based society; instead of books, people are more interested in screens

Is there a revolution? Or is he overstating?
-       Shift in medium (book to screen) challenges the power of authority
o   Kress suggests that because of the “new” revolution there is a shift in agency; readers decide all
Examples

o   Book from 1929 was the common communication; Now, writers have to choose what modes to use based on who is reading
·      Writer communicated to the reader
·      Writer was most important
·      Author decides the agenda
·      Given order designed by the author and therefore decides where the reader starts and where the reader stops
·      “Writer knows best”
·       Writer dominates organization of words, context and content

o   2004
·      Writer and reader play equal role
·      Professor Craig gives example of Wikipedia as a current multimodal writing
·      Open order
·      The reader picks what to learn and where his/her knowledge starts and stops
·       21st century theory is that everyone is different and reading for different readings
·      The reader designs their own reading path

*Kress notes that in  a lot of ways people prefer written word and some people prefer image; there is no longer a default and we now pick the mode and medium apt for message/audience

In order to understand Kress’s affordance theory, the class looked at an image and then compared it to a written visual
-       Image of monk: Overwhelming, eyes first go to the person on fire (in the middle); Scary, painful, disturbing
-       How fast to register image?
o   Image gives perspective to see everything at once; immediately present; we navigate where to go from there
o   Kress uses kids drawing and science books for logic of the image
§  The logic of image

  •   Image evokes more emotion
- Written description of monk: How is this different from image?

·      Gain: provides background info
·      Gain/loss: Can choose how much you see and don’t see
·      Loss: Less likely to believe it
·      Everything is a sequence in writing; gives author power

*Gains and losses= each mode has a strength and weakness 

*Kress has a problem with being overly focused with two modes; not a complete view of multimodality

Class discussion:
Which do we like better or find more useful, Writer/Designer or Kress’s theory?
-       Textbook seemed easier to understand and easier to apply; Kress was way too dense; Kress overcomplicates what he was trying to say and at the same time he oversimplifies by only addressing two modes out of five

Why is Kress’s theory not new?
-       Adaption to writing technologies have always occurred
-       There has always been a difference in people wanting information fast without sequence and those who read/proceed in order

Class Tips:
- Use modal ensembles for project 1


- Office hours from 2-4 pm for any questions about case studies/project 1

No comments:

Post a Comment